%!), S7l/& ♦ I M OV'C?**' BER 7- THE GREAT BRITAtN As t) NAUTICAL CHARTS. tothr editor of THE SHI PPING AND MERCANTILE GAZETTE. Sir, — As we have probably heard all the statements and conjectures respecting the loss of the Great Britain, which are likely to throw any light upon her disaster, I think it right that some of the observations that have been mode should not pass unnoticed. 1 consider it but justice to myself and others, that sopie of the obloquy which has been cast on private charts by the resolutions of the Great Western dlrec'ors, and by those interested in the sate of the Admiralty surveys, should* be fairly answered. 1 would refer more particularly to the remdrkg in the Shipping and Mercantile Gazelle of Oct. 23, and the Nhtilikal Magazine. Up to a recent period the Admiralty had no good charts of the coasts In question, and now make use of my chart of St. George’s Channel f&T the navy. The copyright of this was purchased of the late Captain Huddart by this house for 2,000/., and I will state, that it has afforded materials for nearly every chart that has since been published — Captain Hosken’s chart included. The notice of the lighthouse on St. John’s Point is shown on this chart (as it is upon all others that I have}, and has been so since January, 1841, or four months before the lighthouse itself was illuminated. Concerning the omission of the light in the chart published at Liverpool, I shall not remark, but I think it unjust to argue from that one circumstance that all charts are incorrect, as it is to assume that all Admiralty charts are absolutely perfect. I will not say a word in dispraise of the collection of Admiralty surveys, they are worthy of the nation, and are as complete as care and talent can make them : but they are liable to omissions as gross, and errors as glaring, as that to which the loss of the Great Britain has been attributed. I will cite one or two instances that occur to me. The Admiralty charts of Harwich would have inevitably laid any ship on shore that followed their direction, until Captuin Washington's survey of the harbour was published in 1842. This fine chart was issued with a scale attached, that was nearly one-seventh in error. Another : Captain Blackwood’s survey of Endeavour Straits (Australia) was published in March, 1846; in August, the ship Heroine, following the track laid down in it, after passing two shoals not men- tioned, struck, and was nearly wrecked on a shoal of nine feet, where nine fathoms was marked on the chart. Again, as to description of lights by autho- ritg : — The Nautical Magazine is conducted well, I ac- knowledge, but in a corrected description of the lights in the English Channel at twenty-nine places, in July, 1845, there are not fewer than fourteen errors, auy one of which is as likely to produce a disaster as great as that of the Great Britain. This list is especially marked to be de- pended on. I do not cite these instances invidiously, they may be easily multiplied, but merely to show that absolute perfection is no' attainable. Now it has been complained of that the Admiralty charts are not appreciated Dy the mercantile marine ; that Mr. Bates’s endeavours to promulgate them have been thwarted. 1 can say to this, that every chart seller has the same opportunity of supplying the public with these documents, and at the same rate, and they sold in large numbers by chart publishers. But the Admiralty chart5* are not the only documents of au- thority extant, nor are our n»:.al surveyors the only observers; and if private enterprise be left Utuf (tered, the wants of the public will be far more efficiently serveil i£aJ> by io him, or an observation made by any of his family, lie would continue to muse, seemingly not aware that he had been addressed, and frequently, after a lapse of many minutes, would turn to the person who had accosted him, and reply. His manners were simple and unaffected, and with out appearance of conscious superiority. Though his pursuits necessarily brought with them an extended ac- quaintance, he rarely mixed in general society ; there were comparatively few who enjoyed his intimacy ; to these he was ever most friendly and communicative, and in his own social family circle, where the tem- per more freely developes itself, he displayed a perfect equanimity of mind, and cheerfulness of disposition, relating with good humour and satisfaction anecdotes and incidents of his early life. A handsome monument has been erected to his me- mory in the Chapel of Ease at Allonby, the place ot his nativity. The following inscription, illustrative of his character and talents, and commemorative of the emi- nent services rendered to his country, has been sup- plied by the friend to whom this Memoir is dedicated. -Sacreb to tfjc Jiemorp of CAPTAIN JOSEPH IIUDDART, F.R.S. Formerly of the Honorable East India Company’s Service, And one of the Elder Brethren of the Corporation of the Trinity House, London j HE WAS BORN AT THIS PLACE 11th January, 1741, AND DIED AT HIGHBURY TERRACE, NEAR LONDON, August 19th, 1816. He has left a memorial of his Fame far more lasting than this Monument, in those numerous Works of Science by which he has done Honor to his Country, benefitted Commerce, and improved Navigation. “ Unto whom much is given , of them shall much be required And of him it may be truly said that the pre-eminent powers of his mind, and his superior acquirements in Mathematics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, were unceasingly devoted to the services of humanity, by pointing out a lEtore Secure $atfj in tfje aTracfttog Stop, and by increasing the facilities, and lessening the dangers of those who 16 go down to the sea in Shifts, and occufty their business in great waters .” “ THESE MEN SEE THE WONDERS IN THE DEEP.” They were stroDgly impressed on his capacious mind : he saw and acknowledged in them the wondrous works of God, and meekly trusting in the merits of his Saviour, closed a life of unblemished integrity in the 75th year of his age. HIS ONLY SURVIVING SON Erects this Monument in commemoration of those virtues, which endeared him in all the relations of private life. APPENDIX. A. An account of Persons who could not distinguish Co- lours. By Mr. Joseph Huddart; in a Letter to the Rev. Joseph Priestley, LL.D. F.R.S. Read February 13th, 1777. London, January 15 th} 1777. Sir, When I had the pleasure of waiting on you last winter, I had hopes before now of giving you a more perfect account of the peculiarity of vision which I then mentioned to you, in a person of my acquaint- ance in the North : however, if I give you now the best I am able, I persuade myself you will pardon the delay. 70 1 promised to procure you a written account from the person himself, but this I was unfortunately dis- appointed in, by his dying suddenly of a pleurisy a short time after my return to the country. You will recollect I told you that this person lived at Maryport in Cumberland, near which place, viz. at Allonby, I myself live, and having known him about ten years, have had frequent opportunities of con- versing with him. His name was Harris, by trade a shoemaker. I had often heard from others that he could discern the form and magnitude of all objects very distinctly, but could not distinguish colours. This report having excited my curiosity, I conversed with him frequently on the subject. The account he gave was this : That he had reason to believe other persons saw something in objects which he could not see; that their language seemed to mark qualities with confidence and precision, which he could only guess at with hesitation, and frequently with error. His first suspicion of this arose when he was about four years old. Having by accident found in the 71 street, a child’s stocking, lie carried it to a neighbour- ing house to enquire for the owner: he observed the people called it a red stocking, though he did not understand why they gave it that denomination, as he himself thought it completely described by being- called a stocking. The circumstance, however, re- mained in his memory, and together with subsequent observations led him to the knowledge of his defect. As the idea of colours is among the first that enters the mind, it may perhaps seem extraordinary that he did not observe his want of it still earlier. This, how- ever, may in some measure be accounted for from the circumstance of his family being Quakers, among whom a general uniformity of colours is known to prevail. He observed also that, when young, other children could discern cherries on a tree by some pretended difference of colour, though he could only distinguish them from the leaves by their difference of size and shape. He observed also, that by means of this dif- ference of colour they could see the cherries at a 72 greater distance than lie could, though he could see other objects at as great a distance as they ; that is, where the sight was not assisted by the colour. Large objects he could see as well as other persons ; and even the smaller ones if they were not enveloped in other things, as in the case of cherries among the leaves. I believe he could never do more than guess the name of any colour; yet he could distinguish white from black, or black from any light or bright colour. Dove or straw-colour he called white, and different colours he frequently called by the same name : yet he could discern a difference between them when placed together. In general, colours of an equal de- gree of brightness, however they might otherwise dif- fer, he frequently confounded together. Yet a striped ribbon he could distinguish from a plain one ; but he could not tell what the colours were with any tolerable exactness. Dark colours in general he often mistook for black, but never imagined white to be a dark colour, nor a dark to be a white colour. 73 He was an intelligent man, and very desirous of understanding the nature of light and colours, for which end he had attended a course of lectures in natural philosophy. He had two brothers in the same circumstances as to sight ; and two other brothers and sisters who, as well as their parents, had nothing of this defect. One of the first mentioned brothers, who is now living, is master of a trading vessel belonging to Maryport. I met with him at Dublin, in December 1776, and took the opportunity of conversing with him. 1 wished to try his capacity to distinguish the colours in a prism, but not having one by me, I asked him. Whether he had ever seen a rain-bow ? He re- plied, He had often, and could distinguish the different colours ; meaning only, that it was composed of dif- ferent colours, for he could not tell what they were. I then procured and shewed him a piece of ribbon : he immediately, without any difficulty, pronounced it a striped and not a plain ribbon. He then attempted to name the different stripes : the several stripes of K. 74 white he uniformly, and without hesitation, called white : the four black stripes he was deceived in, for three of them he thought brown, though they were exactly of the same shade with the other, which he properly called black. He spoke, however, with difli- dence as to all those stripes ; and it must be owned, the black was not very distinct: the light green he called yellow ; but he was not very positive : he said, « I think this is what you call yellow/’ The middle stripe, which had a slight tinge of red, he called a sort of blue. But he was most of all deceived by the orange colour j of this he spoke veiy confidently, say- ing, ff This is the colour of grass ; this is green.” I also shewed him a great variety of ribbons, the colours of which he sometimes named rightly, and sometimes as differently as possible from the true colours. I asked him. Whether he imagined it possible for all the various colours he saw, to be mere difference of light and shade ; whether he thought there could be various degrees between white and black ; and that all colours could be composed of these two mix- 75 tures only ? With some hesitation he replied. No, he did imagine there was some other difference. I could not conveniently procure from this person an account in writing; but I have given his own words, having set them down in writing immediately. Besides, as this conversation happened only the 10th of last month, it is still fresh in my memory. I have endeavoured to give a faithful account of this matter, and not to render it more wonderful than it really is. It is proper to add, that the experiment of the striped ribbon was made in the day-time, and in a good light. I am, Sir, &c. k 2 APPENDIX B. Observations on Horizontal Refractions which affect the appearance of terrestrial objects, and the Dip, or Depression of the Horizon of the Sea. By Joseph Huddart, Esq. F.R.S. Read November 24th, 1796. The variation and uncertainty of the dip, in dif- ferent states of the air, taken at the same altitude above the level of the sea, was the occasion of my turning my thoughts to this subject ; as it renders the latitude observed incorrect, by giving an erroneous zenith distance of a celestial object. I have often observed that low lands and the extre- mity of head-lands or points, forming an acute angle with the horizon of the sea, and viewed from a dis- tance beyond it, appear elevated above it, with an 77 open space between the land and the sea. The most remarkable instance of this appearance of the land I observed at Macao, for several days previous to a typhoon, in which the Locko lost her topmasts in Macao Roads ; the points of the islands and low lands appearing the highest, and the spaces between them and the sea the largest, I ever saw. I believe it arises, and is proportional to the evaporation going on from the sea; and in reflecting upon this phenomenon, I am convinced that those appearances must arise from refraction, and that instead of the density of the at- mosphere increasing to the surface of the sea, it must decrease from some space above it ; and that evapo- ration is the principal cause which prevents the uni- formity of density and refraction being continued, by the general law, down to the surface of the earth : and I am inclined to believe, though I mention it here as a conjecture, that the difference of specific gravity in the particles of the atmosphere may be a principal agent in evaporation ; for the corpuscles of air, from their affinity with water, being combined at the sur- 78 face of the fluid from expansion, form air specifically lighter than the drier atmosphere ; and therefore float, or rise, from that principle, as steam from water ; and in their rising (the surrounding corpuscles from the same cause imbibing a part of the moisture), become continually drier as they ascend, yet continue ascend- ing until they become equally dense with the air.* However, these conjectures I shall leave, and proceed to the following observations upon refractions. In the year 1793, when at Allonby in Cumberland, I made some remarks on the appearance of the Abbey Head, in Galloway, which in distance from Allonby is about seven leagues ; and from my window, at fifty feet above the level of the sea at that time of tide, I observed the appearance of the land about the Head as represented in Tab. 1. fig. 1. There was a dry * Mr. Hamilton, in his very curious essay on the ascent of va- pours, does not allow of this principle, even as an assistant; though by a remark (page 15) he takes notice of those appearances in the horizon of the sea, and says they arise from a strong or unusual de- gree of refraction ; the contrary of which I hope to illustrate in tin course of this paper. 79 sand, x y, called Robin Rigg, between me and the Head, at the distance from my house of between three and four miles, over which I saw the horizon of the sea, H O ; the sand at this time was afiout three or four feet above the level of the sea. The hummock cf is a part of the head-land, but appeared insulated or detached from the rest, and considerably elevated • above the sea, with an open space between. I then came down about twenty-five feet, when I had the dry sand of Robin Rigg, x y, in the apparent horizon, and lost all that floating appearance seen from above, and the Abbey Head appeared every where distinct to the surface of the sand ; this being in the afternoon, the wet or moisture on the sand would in a great measure be dried up. I have reason, therefore, to conclude that evaporation is the cause of a less refrac- tion near the surface of the sea; and when so much so as to make an object appear elevated wholly above the horizon, (as at d in fig. 1.) there will from every point of this object issue two pencils of rays of light, which enter the eye of the observer ; and that below 80 the dotted line A B (parallel to the horizon of the sea H O), the objects on the land will appear inverted. To explain this phenomenon, 1 shall propose the following theory, and compare it with the observa- tions which I have made. Suppose H O, fig. 2, to represent the horizontal surface ot the sea, and the parallel lines above it, the lamime or strata of cor- puscles, which next the fluid are most expanded, or the rarest ; and every lamina upwards increasing in density till it arrive at a maximum (and which I shall in future call the maximum of density) at the line DC, above which it again decreases in density, ad infinitum. Though this in reality may be the case, I do not wish to extend the meaning of the word density fur- ther, than to be taken for the refractive power of the atmosphere ; that is, a ray of light entering obliquely a denser lamina to be refracted towards a perpendi- cular to its surface ; and in entering a rarer lamina, the contrary ; which laminae being taken at infinitely email distances, the ray of light will form a curve, agreeable to the laws of dioptrics. 81 In 01 dei to establish this principle in horizontal refractions, I traced over various parts of this shore at different times, when those appearances seemed favor- able, with a good telescope, and found objects suffi- cient to confirm it; though it be difficult at that dis- tance of the land to get terrestrial objects well defined so neai the horizon, as will afterwards appear. One day observing the land elevated, and seeing a small vessel at about eight miles distance, I from my window directed my telescope to her, and thought her a fitter object than any other I had seen for the pur- pose of explaining the phoenomena of these refrac- tions. The telescope was forty feet above the level of the sea, the boat’s mast about thirty-five feet, she being about twenty to thirty tons burthen. The baiometer at 29.7 inches, and Fahrenheit’s thermo- meter at 54°. The appearance of the vessel, as magnified in the telescope, was as represented in fig. 3, and from the mast head to the boom was well defined. I pretty distinctly saw the head and shoulders of the man at L 82 the helm ; but the hull of the vessel was contracted, confused, and ill defined : the inverted image began to be well defined at the boom (for I could not clearly perceive the man at the helm inverted,) and from the boom to the horizon of the sea the sails were well defined, and I could see a small opening above the horizon of the sea, in the angle made by the gaff and mast ; and had the mast been shorter by ten feet (to the height of y), the whole would have been ele- vated above the horizon of the sea, and from y to d an open space. This drawing was taken from a sketch I took at the time, and represents the proportion of the inverted to the erect object, as near as I could take it by the eye, the former being about two-thirds of the latter in height, and the same breadth respec- tively; though at one time during my observation, which I continued for about an hour, I thought the inverted nearly as tall as the erect object. ”1 lie day was fine and clear, with a very light air of wind, and I found very little tremor or oscillation in viewing her through the telescope. 83 I have laid down fig. 4. for the explanation of the above phenomenon, in which A represents the window I viewed 13 the vessel from ; II O, the curved surface of the sea ; C D, parallel to H O, the height of the maximum of density of the atmosphere; the lines marked with the small letters a a, bb, cc, d d , the pencils of rays under their various refractions from the vessel to the eye, or object glass of the telescope. The pencil of rays a a, from a point near the head of the mainsail, is wholly refracted in a curve convex upwards, being every where above the maximum of density ; and the pencil of rays d d, which issues from the same point in the sail, and passes near the horizon of the sea at x, is convex upwards from the sail to W, where it passes the line of maximum of density, which is the point of inflection ; there it becomes convex downwards, passing near the horizon at x to y, where it is again inflected, and becomes convex upwards from thence to the eye. The pencil of rays b b, from the end of the boom, passing nearly parallel to the horizon, and near the maximum of density, suffers l 2 84 very little deviation from a right line in the first part ; but in ascending (from the curvature of the sea) will be convex upwards to the eye. The pencil of rays c c, from the same point in the boom, may have the small part to c convex upwards, from c to z it will be con- vex downwards, and from z to the eye convex up- wards. From this investigation it appears, that two pencils of rays cannot pass from the same point, and enter the eye, from the law of refraction, except one pencil pass through a medium which the other has not en- tered; and therefore the maximum of density was below the boom, and could not exceed ten feet of height above the surface of the sea at the time these observations were made. Respecting the hull of the vessel being confused, and ill defined in the telescope, as by fig. 3, it arises from the blending of the rays, from the different parts of the object, refracted through the two mediums ; some parts of the hull appearing erect, and some in- verted. Suppose the dotted line i i , tig'. 4, an inde- 85 finite pencil of rays, passing from between the inverted and erect parts of the object, or the upper part of the hull of the vessel, to the eye, (for the lower part of the hull could not be observed) : the objects cannot appear inverted, except the angles at the eye a A c and a A d, exceed the angle a A i; for the interme- diate space could only be contracted by the secondary pencils of rays. The lengths of the inverted, com- pared with the erect image of the sail, is as the sines of the angles at the eye a A i to i A d ; and the angle at the eye a A d, made by the two pencils of rays from the same point near the head of the sail, must be double the angle a A i, when the inverted image is as tall as the erect. In this case, the sines of the angles a A b, a A c, sAtl, fig. 4, are proportional to the altitudes ah, a c, ad, in the magnified view of the vessel, fig. 3. Under this consideration no inverted image ot the sail will be formed, until the angle at the eye, made by the two refracted pencils of rays a a and d d, ex- ceed the angle made by a a, and b b, the apparent 86 height of the sail of the vessel ; for were those angles equal, the inverted sail would only be contracted into the parallel of altitude of the boom b, and render the appearance confused, as in the hull of the vessel. Respecting the existence of two pencils of rays entering the eye from every point of an object not more elevated than a, or less than i, fig. 3, in this state of the atmosphere, I cannot bring a stronger proof than that of the strength of a light when the rays pass near the horizon of the sea, proved by the following observations. Going down Channel about five years ago in the Trinity yacht, with several of the elder brethren, to inspect the light-houses, &c. I was told by some of the gentlemen, who had been on a former survey, that the lower light of Portland was not so strong as the upper light, at near distances, but that at greater distances it was much stronger. I suspected that this difference arose from the lower light being at or near the horizon of the sea, and mentioned it at the time ; but afterwards had a good opportunity of making the 87 observation. We passed the Bill of Portland in the evening*, steering towards the Start, a fresh breeze from the northward and clear night; when we had run about five leagues from the lights, during which time the upper light was universally allowed to be the stronger, several gentlemen keeping watch to make observations thereon, the lower light, drawing near the horizon, suddenly shone with double lustre. Mr. Strachan, whose sight is weak, had for some time before lost sight of both lights, but could then clearly perceive the lower light. I then went aloft, (as well as others,) but before 1 got half mast up, the lower light was weaker than the upper one ; on coming down upon deck, I found it again as strong as before. We proceeded on, and soon lost the lower light from the deck ; and upon drawing the upper light near the horizon, it like the former shone exceeding bright. I again went aloft, when it diminished in brightness ; but from the mast-head I could then see the lower light near the horizon as strong as before. This is in consequence of the double quantity of light entering 88 the eye by the two pencils of rays from every point. To illustrate which, we compare the vessel, fig. 4, to a light-house built upon the shore, and A the place of the observer; and having brought down the light so low as to view it in the direction a a, another light would appear in the horizon at x from the pencil d d ; and had the vessel been still enough to have observed it at this time with a good glass, I doubt not but the two images might have been distinctly seen : as the light dropped, (by increasing the distance) the two images would appear continually to approach each other, till blended with double light in one, and dis- appear at the altitude i, above the apparent horizon of the sea. But, as explained before, if the strength of evaporation did not separate by refraction the pen- cils a a and d d to a greater angle than double the angle that the lamps and reflectors appear under, the twro images would be blended, and the strong appear- ance of light would be of shorter duration. The dis- tance run from the lights, during the time each of the lights shone bright, would have been useful, but this 89 did not occur at the time, nor have I had the like oppoitunity since. However, I recommend to the mariner to station people at different heights in look- ing out for a light, in order to get sight of it near the horizon, when it is always the strongest. Respecting the appearance of the Abbey Head before mentioned, fig. 1, the dotted line A B repre- sents the limit, or the lowest points of the land that can be seen over the sea ; for, as above stated, all the objects appearing below this line, are the land above it inverted ; and where the land is low, as at'cZ and m, it must appear elevated above the horizon of the sea. In fig. o. let II O represent the curve of the ocean, and d the extreme top of the mount visible at A by the help of refraction ; the dotted pencil of rays c c passing from d to the eye in some part a little below the maximum of density, where inversion begins ; therefore no land lower than this can be seen ; for any pencil from a point in the land lower than this,’ must in the refraction have a contrary flexure in the curve, and therefore pass above the observer. Let M 90 A D be a tangent to the curve at A, then the object d will appear to be elevated by refraction to D ; also let A v be a tangent to the pencil A x at A, then the ano'le D A x will appear to be an open space, or be- tween D and the horizon of the sea. Suppose a stai should appear very near and over the mount d} as at #, two pencils would issue from every point of it, and form a star below as well as above the hummock d. There are always confused or ill defined images of the objects at the height of the dotted line, fig. 1, above the level of the sea, as before mentioned ; and instead of the points of d ending sharp in that line, they ap- pear blunted, and the Abbey Head is frequently in- sulated at the neck m. I have viewed, from an elevated situation, a point or head land at a distance beyond the horizon of the sea, forming, as in fig. 6, a straight line A B, making an acute angle B A O with the horizon of the sea. Seeing the extreme point blunted and elevated, I descended; and though in descending the horizon cut the land higher, as at H O, H O, yet the point 91 had always the same appearance as a, a, a, fig. 6, though the land is known to continue in the direction of the straight line A B to beneath the horizon, or nearly so, as viewed from the height above. If then from a low situation we view this head land through a telescope, the inclination of the surface A 13 to the horizon being known to be a straight line, it will appear as in fig. 7, the dotted line (at the height of the point where a perpendicular x y would touch the extreme of the land) being at the limit or lowest point of erect vision. And if a tangent to the curved appearance of the land a b, is drawn parallel to the inclined surface of the land A 13, fig. 6, touching it at C, the point C will shew the height of the maximum of density, where the pencil of the rays of light, from thence to the eye, approach nearest the sea ; for pen- cils of rays from this land, taken at small distances from C, will form parallel curves, nearly through the refracting mediums, and C will be the point of greatest refraction ; for above C, as at B, the refraction some- what decreasing, will appear below the line a b, or m 2 92 the parallel to the surface of the land, and the refrac- tions decrease below Ihe point C ; for had they in- creased uniformly down to the surface of the sea, it would render the apparent angle of the point of land s more acute than the angle C a O, contrary to all observations. . Thus I have endeavoured to explain the pheeno- mena of the distorted appearance of the land near the horizon of the sea, when the evaporation is great; and when at the least, I never found the land quite free from it when I used a telescope ; and from thence infer, that we cannot have any expectation to find a true correction for the effect of terrestrial refraction, by taking any certain part of the contained arc ; for the points zCB, fig. 7, will have various refractions, though they are at nearly the same distance from the observer. And if the observations are made wholly over land, if the ground rises to within a small dis- tance of the rays of light in their passage from the object to the eye, as well as at the situation of the object and observer, the refractions will be subject to 93 he influenced by the evaporations of rains, dews, &c., which is sufficiently proved by the observations of Colonel Williams, Captain Mudge, and Mr. Dalby, Phil. Trans. 1795, p. 583. The appearances mentioned by Colonel Williams, Captain Mudge, and Mr. Dalby, (Phil. Trans. 1795, p. 586, 587,) cannot be demonstrated upon general principles, as they arise from evaporation producing partial refractions. In those general principles, it is supposed that the same lamina of density is every where at an equal distance from the surface of the sea, at least as far as the eye can reach a terrestrial object ; but in the partial refractions, the lamina of the expanded or rarefied medium may be of various figures according to circumstances, which will refract according to the incidence of the rays, and affect the appearance of the land accordingly, which I have .often seen to a surprising degree. But my principal view is to shew the uncertainty of the dip of the sea, and that the effect of evaporation tends to depress the apparent horizon at x, when the eye is not above the 94 maximum of density; and from hence the difficulty of laying down any correct formula for these refrac- tions, whilst the law of evaporation is so little under- stood, which indeed seems a task not easy to surmount. The effect indicated by the barometer and thermo- meter is insufficient : and should the hygrometer be improved to fix a standard for moisture in the atmos- phere., and shew the variations near the surface of the ocean, which certainly must be taken into the account (evaporation going on quicker in a dry than a moist atmosphere.,) the theory might still be incomplete for correcting the tables of the dip. I shall therefore con- clude this paper, by shewing a method I used in prac- tice, in order to obviate this error, in low latitudes. When I was desirous to attain more accurately the latitude of any head-land, &c. in sight, I frequently observed the angular distances of the Sun’s nearest limb from the horizons, upon the meridian both north and south, beginning a few minutes before noon, and taking alternately the observations each way, from the poop, or some convenient part of the ship, where the 95 Sun and the horizon both north and south were not intercepted ; and having found the greatest and least distances from the respective horizons, which was at the Sun’s passing the meridian, and corrected both for refraction, by subtracting from the least, and add- ing to the greatest altitude, the quantity given by the table ; and also having corrected for the error of the instrument, and the Sun’s semi-diameter; the sum of these two angular distances, reduced as above, — 180°, is equal to double the dip, as by the following EXAMPLE. The Sun’s declination 4° 32' 30" north, and its semi- diameter 1 5' 58" took the following observation : The meridian distance of the Sun’s nearest limb from the South North horizon of the sea 78° 36' 30" = 101° 1' 20" Refraction per table — 0 11 = -J- Oil Distances corr. for refraction = 78 36 19 = 101 1 31 Error of the Sextant 1 32 -\- 1 32 Sun’s semi-diameter -f- 15 58 -f- 15 58 Carried over ... 78 53 49 101 19 1 9(j South Brought over 78° 53' 49" \ diff. or the dip found .... 6 25 Altitude reduced = 78 47 24 Zenith distance =11 12 36 The Sun’s declination N. . . = 4 3 2 30 Latitude of the ship N. . . . = 15 45 06 North 101° 19' 1" 78 58 49 180 12 50 180' diff. ... 12 50 | = G 25 Dip. I regret that I cannot in this paper insert the dip which I have found in my observations ; for I only retained the latitude of the ship determined thereby, as is usual at sea ; I generally rejected the error of the instrument, the dip, and semi-diameter, as they affect both observations with the same signs, and re- duced the observation by the following method : South North Sun’s dist. as before . 78° 36' 30" 101° 1' 20" Refraction — Oil -f- 011 Dis. cor. for refraction 78 36 19 101 1 31 101° 1' 31" + 78 36 19 Sura of S.diam. dip, & Sum 179 37 50 refraction — f diff. — 11 5 180 •+• 11 5 78 47 24 Diff. 22 10 i 11 5 101 12 36 90 90 The \ dist. as before =11 12 36 | D. = 11 12 36 97 It may be observed, that neither the dip, semi- diameter, or index error, can affect the zenith dis- tance of the Sun’s centre; and the refraction being small near the zenith, the result must be true if the angles are accurately taken j and it is only necessary to obseive, that when the sum of the distances is less than 180°, the half difference must be added to the distances, as by the last reduction. There is a diffi- culty in making this observation when the Sun passes the meridian very near the zenith, as the change in azimuth from east to west is too cpiick to allow suffi- cient time; nor can it be obtained by the sextant when the Sun passes the meridian more than 30 de- grees from the zenith ; for I never could adjust the back observation of the Hadley’s quadrant with suffi- cient accuracy to be depended upon. N #O0t0Cttpt. -©o— Perhaps it ought to have been more particularly stated in the body of this memoir, that between the late Captain Huddart and many of the highly scien- tific men who were his contemporaries, there existed feelings of strong attachment ; and that when either he was jointly engaged with them, or opportunities occurred in which kindness could be expressed towards him, the best attention was always offered. Among others, whose professions led them to act with Cap- tain Huddart, was the late Mr. Rennie, with whom he was engaged in many of his most important reports and public works ; and it is in the knowledge of the writer, that Mr. Rennie was at all times happy to have the advice and sanction of Captain Huddart, previous to engaging in any work of consequence. To have been thus consulted by one so sound in science and 100 so useful in its application as the late Mr. Rennie, will be considered a valuable testimonial of his knowledge and abilities ; and Captain Huddart was anxious, while his powers remained, to further the undertakings of his friend. With the late Mr. Watt of Soho, eminent as a philosopher, and the greatest contributor to the ad- vancement of practical science that this country or even Europe has ever known. Captain Huddart had the happiness of being well acquainted ; and although their individual pursuits had not in the earlier periods of their lives led them to much personal intercourse, so great was Mr. Watt’s estimation of him, and so anxious was he to evince it, that at a very advanced period of life, and without solicitation on the part of Captain Huddart, he presented himself in London, purposely to attend as an evidence in support of a patent which had been infringed, and which was at the time under litigation. This anecdote, trifling as it might appear under any other circumstance, serves only to sanction the opinion which the recorder of 101 Captain Huddart’s life entertains of his abilities. The friendship and active co-operation of such men as the late Mr. Watt and Mr. Rennie, cannot fail to shed a lustre over his memory. It ought too, to have been known, that in his own pai ticuhu sphere, and in the East India Company’s service, where he passed so large a portion of his life, he was equally beloved and respected, for he was ever kind and ready to afford such assistance as was in his power: and in relation to his anxiety to forward the science of Navigation, it reflects credit on his memory, that after a fire which destroyed the first edition of that most excellent and accurate work, Tables for Navi- gation and Nautical Astronomy, by Mendoza de Rios,” Captain Huddart materially contributed to the print- ing of a second. As a member of the Trinity House, his talents and acquirements were always at the service of the Corporation ; and in the many and extensive surveys undertaken by him for this most honourable and useful Board, he displayed a knowledge of the piactical application of science, which few other men 102 have attained ; and so plain, but so correct were the instructions given by him for the various Lights and Beacons erected under his immediate attention, that mariners of slight acquirement cannot fail to under- stand them ; and so anxious was he to forward one of the particular branches entrusted to the care of the Trinity House, that of Light-houses, that in several instances he attended their erection ; not suffering that to be done by others which could be accomplished by himself, when great responsibility or public utility de- manded his personal superintendance. W. Phillips, Printer, London.